On the afternoon of November 18, 2025, the digital world seemed to hold its breath. For approximately 42 minutes, millions of workers, students, and developers worldwide found their screens displaying a uniform error message: “502 Bad Gateway”.

It wasn’t just one site having issues. ChatGPT stopped answering questions, discussions on Discord were interrupted, and millions of designs on Canva failed to save. This phenomenon was not due to severed undersea cables or sophisticated cyberattacks, but because a single infrastructure entity experienced a disruption, namely Cloudflare. This incident forces us to ask again, how fragile is our current internet architecture?

What Actually Happened?

The November 18 incident was not a single anomaly in 2025. Data shows a recurring pattern of disruptions at the Control Plane level among the world’s largest CDN (Content Delivery Network) service providers.

In this case, the problem originated from an internal BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) routing misconfiguration during a routine update. Cloudflare, which acts as the “traffic police” for nearly 20% of the global web, accidentally directed traffic into a “digital abyss” (blackhole). Consequently, the sites protected behind it became inaccessible, even though the original servers of those sites were perfectly healthy.

Why Was the Impact Global?

To understand the scale of this incident, we need to dissect three main academic concepts that form the foundation (as well as the weakness) of the modern internet:

1. Concentration Risk

The internet is supposed to be decentralized. However, for the sake of efficiency and security, the technology industry tends toward centralization. Currently, the Reverse Proxy and CDN market is dominated by a handful of major players (Cloudflare, Akamai, Fastly).

When one vendor controls such a massive market share, we face Concentration Risk. If that vendor “sneezes,” the entire internet “catches the flu.” This is the paradox of efficiency: the easier it is for us to use one centralized service, the greater the systemic risk we create.

2. SPOF (Single Point of Failure)

In system architecture, SPOF is a component that, if it fails, will halt the entire system. For many startups up to enterprise companies, the CDN is their SPOF. They might have redundant database servers across three continents, but if the gateway (CDN) is closed, no user can enter.

3. Cloud Resilience vs. Uptime

Many people equate Uptime with Resilience.

• Uptime is about how long a server stays running without interruption.
• Resilience is about how quickly a system recovers when failure inevitably occurs.

The November 18 incident showed that many modern systems have high Uptime on paper, but low Resilience. They lack a failover mechanism (automatic redirection) to a backup CDN provider when the main path goes down.

Solutions

Learning from this incident, future engineers must no longer be naive. Some solutions to prevent a total “internet shutdown” include:

1. Multi-CDN Strategy: Do not rely on a single vendor. Use smart DNS that can redirect traffic to vendor B if vendor A goes down.
2. Chaos Engineering: Intentionally “shut down” parts of the server during working hours to train the system (and the engineering team) to become accustomed to handling failures.
3. Graceful Degradation Design: If the CDN goes down, the application should not display a white blank, but rather show a simple static version (HTML only) so that information is still conveyed.

Curious about how tech giants keep servers alive and want to learn more about Distributed Systems? Come join the Bachelor of Informatics program at Telkom University Purwokerto!

References

• Google Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) Books: Especially the chapters on “Embracing Risk” and “Service Level Objectives” for the definition of Resilience vs Uptime.
• Downdetector Global Reports: Data on the impact on third-party services (ChatGPT, Discord, Canva).
• Tanenbaum, A. S., & van Steen, M. (2017). Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms. Mandatory academic textbook for distributed systems concepts.